<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/</link>
	<description>Home of Noel Heikkinen's thoughts, audio, photos, video, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-179727</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/#comment-179727</guid>
		<description>Hey, Abby-

Apparently, there have been quite a few misreportings on the Codex Sinaticus over the last several weeks.  Here is a great overview of some of the biggies:

http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2009/07/codex-sinaiticus-completely-on-line-now/

One in particular is the resurrection one you cited.  The missing passage is not actually about Jesus' resurrection but one of the passages regarding his appearances to his disciples.  It's actually a passage that has been hotly debated for years now.

Just thought you'd like to read the other side of the story.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Abby-</p>
<p>Apparently, there have been quite a few misreportings on the Codex Sinaticus over the last several weeks.  Here is a great overview of some of the biggies:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2009/07/codex-sinaiticus-completely-on-line-now/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2009/07/codex-sinaiticus-completely-on-line-now/</a></p>
<p>One in particular is the resurrection one you cited.  The missing passage is not actually about Jesus&#8217; resurrection but one of the passages regarding his appearances to his disciples.  It&#8217;s actually a passage that has been hotly debated for years now.</p>
<p>Just thought you&#8217;d like to read the other side of the story.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail</title>
		<link>http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-179721</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noelheikkinen.com/2009/07/03/mexico/#comment-179721</guid>
		<description>Heyya Noel!  I thought you'd be pretty interested in this.  I've been following this for months.  It's neat they are putting the oldest bible found online.  I also  think it's interesting it doesn't even mention Christ rising again. I just think it's neat because I've never been one to take the bible 100% literal truth but I think it's neat something that is so major to our religion wasn't in this bible. Hope you find it just as interesting! 

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/07/06/ancient.bible.online/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heyya Noel!  I thought you&#8217;d be pretty interested in this.  I&#8217;ve been following this for months.  It&#8217;s neat they are putting the oldest bible found online.  I also  think it&#8217;s interesting it doesn&#8217;t even mention Christ rising again. I just think it&#8217;s neat because I&#8217;ve never been one to take the bible 100% literal truth but I think it&#8217;s neat something that is so major to our religion wasn&#8217;t in this bible. Hope you find it just as interesting! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/07/06/ancient.bible.online/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/07/06/ancient.bible.online/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
